Members said title, sorts of (single-sex otherwise coeducational) and you will banding of your own large schools that they had went to
Professionals.
400 and you will eighty-three players was indeed hired of a massive college in the Hong kong by way of advertising printed into the campus and places, size characters thanks to divisions and qualities, and you can snowballing. Evaluation occurred in the a laboratory. Members complete the new gender salience measure, the brand new mixed-sex nervousness level and you can advertised their market background. Every strategies was basically exhibited within their completely new English code due to the fact English ‘s the typical from classes to possess tertiary knowledge in the Hong-kong. This study try done in accordance for the advice and you will acceptance of one’s School from Hong-kong Human Research Ethics Panel (HKU HREC). All of the sufferers provided created informed concur in accordance with the Statement regarding Helsinki. Parental concur wasn’t required by the fresh HKU HREC because of it decide to try.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total loveaholics parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
Sex salience scale.
Gender salience is actually counted by the same means used in Study step 1. Brand new inter-rater accuracy is actually good for the responses (? between .87 to help you .99).
Percentage of almost every other-gender best friends size.
Percentage of other-intercourse close friends is measured by the exact same means utilized in Analysis 1. Portion of other-gender family wasn’t assessed in the college decide to try.
Mixed-gender stress measure.
Such as Analysis step one, people reported the mixed-gender nervousness to the altered matchmaking anxiety measure (DAS-A) . Weighed against Data step one, players within the Data 2 finished a complete 21-product sort of DAS-A for the reason that relationship sense try prominent throughout the college or university shot (93.4% of one’s players stated some sort of relationships feel; look for set of dating sense things from the Relationships Records Questionnaire in the Table D into the S1 Document). Those who got never ever dated before was asked to assume just how they would be and you can work throughout the described things. For it full scale, ten circumstances counted Anxiety about Negative Assessment, eight items mentioned Personal Stress within the Matchmaking Issues, five things counted Public Stress in the Blended-gender Organizations, and you may five filler items given a rest regarding rating nervousness-relevant activities. The inner consistency was ideal for complete DAS-An excellent (? = .95), Anxiety about Bad Review (? = .92), Public Stress in the Relationship (? = .89), and you will Personal Distress inside the Blended-gender Teams (? = .80). Because the our very own focus wasn’t merely on the relationship nervousness and just dos.6% of your school members said having zero heterosexual appeal at all, i incorporated all the users from the data out of blended-intercourse stress and you will controlled to own sexual positioning.